Alas, poor Horowitz!

I'll leave the debunking of Horowitz's book-whoring FrontPage post to another place and time, but I just wanted to take a moment to draw attention to his endnotes. Now, I know that most folks will be dazzled enough by the superscript numbers in the text to ascribe scholarly legitimacy to any random diatribe, but don't you think Horowitz could have cited something other than items he either wrote or had published in one of his fora?